Should Rutherford County Start Its Own Police Force?

 

September 1, 2022 

Back in 2020 I wrote about the reasons why Rutherford County should start their own police force.

  1. It would take the responsibility off of the Sheriff and let him concentrate on the jail and courthouse. (The 911 Communications Center has already been moved from his office.)
  2. It would take political affiliations out of the equation so that officers would not be afraid for their jobs every four years.
  3. The officers and administrators would be accountable to the county but also would have the job protection of the county policies and procedures standing behind them.
  4. It would place officer/administrative accountability in the County’s hands.
  5. It would help to restore the public’s faith in our officers and their behavior.

Accountability has long been an issue with the Sheriff’s Office. There seem to have been way too many people acting on their own without adequate supervision and oversight.

District Attorney Ted Bell

District Attorney Ted Bell has seemingly turned a blind eye to officer incidents and never has an SBI report been revealed to the public concerning these incidents. Even if charges were warranted, D.A. Bell is the person who decides to charge the officer involved or not. During Bell’s tenure a charge was only made once when the assault of a deputy on a handcuffed inmate was captured on video. That conviction is being appealed this month.

In those law enforcement cases there has been no one that the public could turn to for answers. Cloak and dagger seem to be the operating procedure as far as the general public was concerned.

Recently we have seen more information coming out of the Sheriff’s Office and they have installed a body scanner at the jail, but really, is this too little, too late?

Sheriff Chris Francis

Sheriff Francis is leaving office this year. He is not running for sheriff again. We will have a new sheriff after the November election. There are three good men running for this office but as I have said before, are we not asking too much of one man?

The jail is absolutely out of control. It is going to take a full time commitment to try to fix it. That is hard to do if you are also trying to supervise and coordinate the officers of the Sheriff’s Department whose responsibilities cover Rutherford County. Gaston and Mecklenburg Counties started their own county police departments and left the Sheriff to run the jail and courthouse.

In 2020 I stated that it would take Legislative action to make that even a possibility. I have been researching lately and came across a Senate Bill from 1983 that specifically addresses this issue for Rutherford County.

It was a time when the Commissioners had to face the possibility that their Sheriff might be in some legal difficulty and they would need something in place in the event that he could not perform his duties. The Sheriff (at that time) got it worked out so the County did not pursue it but the Legislation still stands. It reads as follows:

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA

1983 SESSION

CHAPTER 271

SENATE BILL 231

AN ACT TO ALLOW THE RUTHERFORD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TO ESTABLISH A COUNTY POLICE FORCE. 

The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:

Section 1.  The Rutherford County Board of Commissioners is authorized to establish a county police force, to appoint a police chief, to employ other police officers, and to establish the jurisdiction of the county police force within Rutherford County, effective on or after the first Monday in December of 1986.

Sec. 2.  Pursuant to this act and other provisions of law, the Rutherford County Board of Commissioners shall adopt and promulgate rules governing the establishment and operation of the Rutherford County police force.  Such rules shall be filed with the clerk to the Board of County Commissioners and shall be made available for public inspection at reasonable times.

Sec. 3.  (a) The Rutherford County Board of Commissioners MAY put the question of establishing a county police force to a referendum of the qualified voters of Rutherford County.  The referendum shall be conducted by the Rutherford County Board of Elections under the provisions of Chapter 163 of the General Statutes.

(b)       The questions on the ballot shall be:

“@ FOR establishment of a county police force. @ AGAINST establishment of a county police force.”

(c)       If the Rutherford County Board of Commissioners CHOOSES to hold a referendum under this section and a majority of the voters vote “FOR establishment of a county police force”, then the Rutherford County Board of Commissioners shall appoint a county police force under Sections 1 and 2 of this act.

Sec. 4.  This act is effective upon ratification.

In the General Assembly read three times and ratified, this the 6th day of May, 1983.

Two very important words here, “MAY” and “CHOOSES”, mean that the Commissioners can decide on their own to implement this policy without a vote if they so choose.

The reason that this is so very important at this time is if the County is going to do this they need to decide before the November election. It would be much easier to implement this change before a new administration takes over. Not impossible mind you but easier on everybody concerned.

With all the issues that we currently have with the jail, possible corruption, excessive violence complaints, and outright negligence it is time for the county to step up and do something for the citizens of this county. There is little to no confidence of our current Sheriff’s Office by the general public. It is time to change that.

(L-R) Greg Lovelace, Bryan King, Michael Benfield, Alan Toney, David Hunt

It is time to let the good officers shine and given them all some protection from political repercussions of their own beliefs. It is time for accountability. It is time for action.

If this is something you feel it is time for, contact your County Commissioners. You can contact any of them not just your district representative and let them know.  You can leave them a message at 828-287-6060 or you can email them at the following addresses:

Bryan King, Chair  (bryan.king@rutherfordcountync.gov)

Alan Toney, Vice-Chair (alan.toney@rutherfordcountync.gov)5

Michael Benfield (michael.benfield@rutherfordcountync.gov)

Greg Lovelace (greg.lovelace@rutherfordcountync.gov)

David Hunt (david.hunt@rutherfordcountync.gov)

The next County Commissioner meeting is Tuesday September 6th at 6 p.m. in the County Annex Building on 289 N.Main Street in Rutherfordton. Anyone can sign up before the meeting to speak for two (2) minutes and let them know how you feel about this.

Stand up and speak out. This is your community and your tax dollars. Let’s bring transparency, trust and accountability back to the police in our county.

“Laws For Thee But Not For Me”- Ted Bell Does It Again

 

August 10, 2022

Here in Rutherford and McDowell County we don’t have a choice for District Attorney in November. That decision was made by 13% of voters back in May in the Republican primary.

Ted Bell

Ted Bell who has altered body cam video in a major death by officer case (verified in court) not charged any officer in that case, not released the official SBI report concerning this case or any other case involving the Sheriff’s office.

D.A.Ted Bell with Judge Randy Pool

Ted Bell who let his friend Judge Pool off the hook for sexual misconduct on the bench.

Ted Bell who has as of yet to try the Word of Faith Fellowship cases after over 6 years.

Ted Bell who also refuses to show families the body cam video from questionable cases about the death of their loved ones until made to by a court order.

Ted Bell who reportedly has had numerous complaints made about him to the NC Bar association.

Ted Bell who lied about his political endorsements while campaigning knowingly endangering the positions of multiple law enforcement officials for violation of the Hatch Act.

Yes, that Ted Bell, our current District Attorney is at it again. He is not complying with election rules that all others must abide by. The question is why? What is he hiding? How much money he spent? Who donated it, and if so why? It is just habit for him now?

Or does he really truly think the laws don’t apply to him. Hummm………

The Board of Elections requires that all candidates turn in their campaign finance records. They have a set time for them to do this.  The date this year was July 12th. (29 days ago) This is DA Bell’s third campaign. He is fully aware of this yet as of today he still has not complied.

Of course as long as it takes him to hear a trial (unless it’s someone who complained about him to the bar) I guess we shouldn’t be surprised. The question is how long are the people of his district going to turn their heads the other way when it comes to Ted Bell?

You do not have to vote for him (even though he is the only name on the ballot in November) you can leave it blank and show the results. He still will be elected even if he only voted for himself and we all know he has many “friends” who seem to owe him so there’s that.

It is a shame and disgrace that he is representing this district. Our citizens deserve better but as we all know the “good ole boy network” is strong here. Hopefully the bar will address this for us and he will lose his law license and we can have an appointed DA but until then we need to watch and report every time he violates the oath and responsibility of his office.

It is hard to remove a sitting DA but not impossible. (see Henderson County….they did it) Judgement may be slow but it is coming Mr. Bell and if you continue to think you are above it all you will be sadly mistaken. It comes for us all.

Ted Bell ….Accountability Will Come

 

D.A. Ted Bell

May 18,2022

The Republican primary is over and Ted Bell has won yet again. There was a total of 12,433 votes cast for District Attorney in the District 29A Republican primary out 57,776 eligible voters. Ted Bell received 7562 votes making him elected by only 13% of the eligible voting population in the district. He has no opponent from any other party so the office is his yet again. SSDD as the younger generation says.

That being said does not mean that the “cloak and dagger” mentality that has existed in the DA’s office under Ted Bell can continue. It was hoped that electing someone new would “clean up” the office but since that is not going to happen then other avenues must be pursued. Can Ted Bell change? It’s possible but unlikely at this point in his career.

D.A.Ted Bell with Judge Randy Pool

Removing an elected (even if only by 13% of voters) District Attorney is difficult, but not impossible. A District Attorney who has admittedly falsified video evidence in a death investigation (considered prosecutorial misconduct), discussed confidential information with others outside his office, and seemingly protected his friend, former Judge Randy Pool, who committed criminal acts (with 33 known victims at this time) so he could retire with his full benefit package to just name a few of his “behaviors,” does not need to be in office.

Last year in Henderson County District Attorney Greg Newman, representing Henderson, Transylvania and Polk counties was removed from office on April 27 by Judge Robert Irwin.  On Feb. 11, 2021, an affidavit was filed with the Clerk of Superior Court in Henderson County asking for D.A. Greg Newman’s removal on various grounds pursuant to NC Gen. Stat.7A-66.

Greg Newman

At the center of Newman’s removal hearing was a sexual assault case in which the victim’s family claims Newman denied them the right to be heard in court. More than a dozen families from his district came together to file a motion to have Newman removed from office due to an alleged pattern of willful misconduct. Last year Newman was disciplined by the state bar for making a false statement in a child rape case. He was suspended but still allowed to practice

North Carolina state statute 7A-66, allows any person to request Superior Court to hold a proceeding to suspend or remove a district attorney from office if certain criteria are met.

Under the state statute, the following are grounds for suspension of a district attorney for his or her removal from office:

  • Mental or physical incapacity interfering with the performance of his duties, which is, or is likely to become, permanent;
  • Willful misconduct in office;Willful and persistent failure to perform his duties;
  • Habitual intemperance;
  • Conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude;
  • Conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, which brings the office into disrepute; or
  • Knowingly authorizing or permitting an assistant district attorney to commit any act constituting grounds for removal.

If a D.A. is guilty of even ONE of the seven points listed above then ANYONE can request a Superior Court hearing to have them either removed or suspended from office.

According to the state statute, at the hearing the Superior Court judge will hear evidence and make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and if he/she finds that grounds for removal exist, he/she will enter an order permanently removing the district attorney from office, and terminate his or her salary.

 The procedure for removal, as set out in GS 7A-66, includes these steps (from UNC School of Government):

  • The process begins with the filing of a sworn affidavit charging the district attorney with specific grounds for removal. The affidavit may be filed by any person. It is filed with the clerk of court of the county where the DA lives.
  • The clerk is to bring the affidavit to the attention of the senior resident superior court judge immediately.
  • The senior resident judge is to review and act upon the charges within 30 days or refer the matter within that time to another superior court judge who either lives in the district or is holding court there.
  • The judge reviewing the charges may, but is not required to, suspend the DA pending a hearing if the judge determines that the charges would indeed be grounds for removal if true and that there is probable cause to believe the charges are true. The DA’s salary continues during the suspension.
  • If the judge determines that the charges are not grounds for removal, or that there is no probable cause to believe they are true, the judge is to dismiss the proceeding.
  • The DA is to be given written notice of the hearing with a copy of the charges. The statute does not specify who is responsible for giving the notice. In the absence of other direction, the superior court judge who sets the hearing should direct that the notice be served.
  • The hearing is to be held not less than ten and not more than 30 days after the notice is served.
  • The hearing may be before the superior court judge who reviewed the charges or any other superior court judge who lives in or is holding court in the district.
  • The hearing is required to be public and must be recorded.
  • The judge is to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. The judge must order removal and terminate the DA’s salary upon finding that grounds for removal exist.
  • The DA may appeal a removal order to the Court of Appeals for error of law. The DA may not perform duties of the office while the appeal is pending. A DA who is reinstated upon appeal or remand is entitled to back pay to the time of removal.
NC Attorney General Josh Stein

In practice, district attorneys, who prosecute the bulk of criminal cases in the United States, answer to no one. The State Attorney General is the highest law enforcement officer in state government and often has the power to review complaints about unethical and illegal conduct on the part of district attorneys.

You can file a complaint with them at this link https://ncdoj.gov/contact-doj/ or call the numbers below:

  • Toll-free within North Carolina: 1-877-5-NO-SCAM
  • From outside North Carolina: (919) 716-6000
  • En Espanol: (919) 716-0058

A Bar complaint can also be filed by ANYONE against Ted Bell. You do not need a lawyer to file a grievance. All you have to do is tell the Bar what the lawyer did that you think was improper. Bar counsel will conduct the investigation and any legal research that may be necessary. You must identify yourself in the complaint.

To file a bar complaint contact them at this link. https://www.ncbar.gov/media/490329/grievance-form.pdf  or send a detailed email to complaints@ncbar.gov

If you feel that you or your family have been wrongly treated or represented by D.A. Ted Bell or his office please contact me at debkellercares@gmail.com  or editor@rccatalyst.com.  Knowledge is power. Together we CAN make a difference and help bring integrity back to the D.A.’s office.

 

 

D.A.Ted Bell ….Violating The Hatch Act?

May 2, 2022 

How many questionable decisions has District Attorney Ted Bell made in his tenure here? It obviously is an answer that will take years to fully discover. The latest is his decision to use public political endorsements of law enforcement officials in radio ads on WCAB, social media, newspapers, and mailers.

Mr. Bell as an attorney and current District Attorney is certainly aware of the Hatch Act. It clearly states that “​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​The Hatch Act, a federal law passed in 1939, limits certain political activities of federal employees, as well as some state, D.C., and local government employees who work in connection with federally funded programs. ​The law’s purposes are to ensure that federal programs are administered in a nonpartisan fashion, to protect federal employees from political coercion in the workplace, and to ensure that federal employees are advanced based on merit and not based on political affiliation.”​​​​ ​​

​“The Hatch Act restricts the political activity of individuals principally employed by state, District of Columbia, or local executive agencies and who work in connection with programs financed in whole or in part by federal loans or grants. Usually, employment with a state, D.C., or local agency constitutes the principal employment of the employee in question. However, when an employee holds two or more jobs, principal employment is generally deemed to be that job which accounts for the most work time and the most earned income.”   (See link here)

Mr. Bell seems to have forgotten that the stated endorsers he has listed all have federal funding sources and therefore are subject to the Hatch Act. (see above)  After an extensive search online I was unable to find any stated confirmation of these endorsements. I reached out via email last Thursday April 28th to all the individuals mentioned to receive direct confirmation of their endorsement explaining to them that I was writing an article about it.

No one mentioned above by Mr. Bell has replied to my original email. I then emailed Mr. Bell directly asking if he had written endorsements from these officials. He too did not answer my email but did post within a few hours of my sending it regarding his endorsements on his Ted Bell for DA Facebook page.

D.A. Ted Bell

April 29 at 7:00 PM  ·

I never want to be misinterpreted or to mislead anyone, so based on a couple of questions I received I want to clarify. As I have always said, I have been unanimously endorsed by the heads of all of our local law enforcement agencies – the Chiefs and Sheriffs. This endorsement is in their personal capacity – obviously, a Town or Police Department cannot endorse someone, and I don’t want someone to misunderstand and think that I am stating that I am endorsed by a Town or Police Department as opposed to an individual.

Thank you for your support,

Ted”  

I then emailed all the supposed endorsers of Mr. Bell and asked for a direct confirmation or denial of the endorsement along with their department’s policy on endorsing partisan politicians. I also asked if their departments directly or indirectly receive federal funding. I did copy Mr. Bell on this email. As of right now I have not heard back from any of them regarding this except Marion PD Chief Allen Lawerence who asked for my article deadline date.

It is very concerning that only one of the “public servants” emailed answered me. These people have  sworn to protect and serve the public in their individual communities. How can the general public feel protected if they fear retaliation for not supporting the political candidate that the department Chief or Sheriff has endorsed. This is the entire purpose behind the Hatch Act, to decrease political coercion of any kind.

If you as a citizen are concerned about this you can file a complaint about these officials with U.S. Office of Special Counsel  Click on this link File a Complaint”or click on the green button on the right hand side under the banner on the home page. They will investigate this and have a hearing. This is a link to complaints they have heard (click here)

If you are concerned about Ted Bell’s actions you can also file a complaint with the Attorney General’s office in Raleigh. (see link)  If you go to file a complaint be sure to check “received in the mail” if you received an endorsement flyer. Also you can attach the flyer you received or a screen shot of social media. If you need to call Toll-free within North Carolina: 1-877-5-NO-SCAM.

 

You can also complain to the NC State Bar. Anyone can file a complaint to the Bar Association about any practicing lawyer. For info click here To directly file a complaint you can click this link https://www.ncbar.gov/media/490329/grievance-form.pdf or call (919) 828-4620. Individuals who file grievances in good faith against a North Carolina lawyer are protected by statute from retaliation.

Ted Bell himself has shown by his Facebook post (as seen above) that he knows using official endorsements are out of line but it’s too late to retract it as the mailers and social media ads have all gone out to the public.

D.A. Ted Bell

It’s one thing for Mr. Bell to personally erroneously represent his endorsements as official statements but to throw these men and their departments under the bus” (so to speak) for his own political gain seems unconscionable even for him.

Is this the man you want to represent you as District Attorney? One who seemingly conveniently “forgets” major points of law or feels the law does not apply to him when it suits his purpose? One who has no issue with endangering other officials with his actions? This man who stands up publically and says he is the embodiment of “ethical behavior.”

When you consider the length of time it takes to have a case heard by him, the plea deals, the protection of Judge Pool, the admitted alteration of body cam video in a death by officer shooting, his working relationship in the office, and now the questionable endorsement mailer it makes you wonder. It makes us all wonder.

(contributed photo)

Rutherford and McDowell County both deserve better than this.

Please go vote for integrity, for transparency, for ethical behavior, for legal knowledge, but especially for change. You can make a difference.

Early voting is going on now. Final primary voting date is May 17th. All unaffiliated voters are eligible to vote in the Republican primary.

 

This article will be updated as new information is received.

Sheriff Office & Narcotics Team Prey on Community?

Now that we have provided a broad sketch of the alleged racketeering enterprise involving, in part, the Rutherford County Sheriff’s Office and the narcotics team, RC Catalyst will begin providing detailed examples of how Murray and the black team prey on the most vulnerable members of our community to enrich themselves and allow the drug trade to continue in this judicial district.

NARCOTICS TEAM FORCES MAN INTO COOPERATION

Beginning in 2007, an individual (who has asked that his identity be withheld due to safety concerns) was living as a troubled teen. As a youth, he tried methamphetamine and quickly became addicted. At the same time, one of the narcotics team officers approached him and enlisted his help in exchange for not charging him with what were petty drug charges. The officer stated that he was going to “save his life.” As this individual explained to RC Catalyst, “they left out the part about taking it in the end.”

This individual initially worked with the narcotics officers that preceded Chadd Murray and the current narcotics team. He stated that it was when Murray rose in the ranks with the narcotics team that things began to quickly deteriorate.

In 2013, this individual was arrested for possession of a stolen vehicle while cooperating with the narcotics team to gather information. He was sentenced to 22-28 months in prison. He was released in 2015.

MURRAY AND DISTRICT ATTORNEY TED BELL COERCE MAN INTO COOPERATING AFTER SERVING TIME IN PRISON

During the two (2) year period, this individual, for the first time in years, became sober. Upon his release, he intended to maintain that lifestyle and focus on his family. However, he still had an outstanding charge for larceny pending in Cleveland County. Once he completed his prison sentence, the prosecutor suddenly increased that charge to habitual status, which drastically increases the potential prison time.

At the same time his charges were increased, this individual attended a sobriety celebration event in Ellenboro. District Attorney Ted Bell – who was running for reelection at the time – and Murray – who had, by that point taken over as the head of the narcotics team – along with several members of the narcotics team were present.

One of Murray’s officers approached this individual and stated “I hear you’re selling drugs again.” This individual had never been a narcotics dealer and was finally attempting to re-establish his life without drugs.

This individual responded that he was not and had not been selling drugs. The narcotics officer then threatened that he would be charging the individual’s ailing father with a charge being pursued by the Sheriff’s Office and ensure the father spent his remaining years in prison if the individual did not agree to work with them.

Ted Bell then approached this individual, leaned over toward him, and whispered in his ear that “a phone call can move mountains,” indicating that he could resolve this individual’s then-pending habitual larceny charge in exchange for his cooperation.

Despite wanting to remain out of the drug circles in which he was previously involved, this individual agreed to assist based on the promise that his father would be left alone by the Sheriff’s Office.

District Attorney Ted Bell wrote a letter to the prosecutor in Cleveland County on this individual’s behalf stating that he was responsible for taking hundreds of thousands of dollars of narcotics off the street, in addition to resulting in large amount of cash proceeds. That letter has now disappeared from the court file.

As noted by this individual, the seized narcotics and drug proceeds were rarely documented and, when they were, the narcotics officers never identified the actual amounts seized. As briefly described in the previous article, this individual – like others discussing these issues with RC Catalyst – confirmed that narcotics were provided to other individuals being forced to continue selling drugs to by reselling drugs the narcotics team.

The cash proceeds were, in almost all cases, taken by the narcotics team and never to be seen again.

The individuals from whom narcotics and drug proceeds were seized were rarely arrested, even more rarely prosecuted, and virtually never convicted. Rather, the same individuals continued providing the community with narcotics and the narcotics team with their resulting profits.

MURRAY DEMANDS NEVER-ENDING COOPERATION

Despite this individual’s attempt to prevent his family from being targeted by the black team by assisting with the initial endeavors identified by Murray and his team, Murray never relented in his threats to harm this individual and his family if he ever refused to continue assisting Murray and his team in their alleged racketeering enterprise.

Murray’s demands came with a severe cost to this individual.

By forcing this individual to continuously be around active methamphetamine users, this individual had no option to but use the drug that had previously ruined his life in order to protect himself from those Murray demanded he interact with. Once he was, once again, addicted, this individual was immediately more prone to Murray’s threats and Murray’s abusive behavior toward this individual and his family drastically increased.

The narcotics team continued forcing this individual to assist them for several years, frequently taunting him and making clear his life had no meaning them (in fact, in one instance, Murray expressly stated “my life matters – yours doesn’t”).

As but one of the most egregious examples, one of the narcotics officers cut the face off of a picture of a sheriff’s deputy shaking hands with Sheriff Francis and pasted this individual’s face. That picture was posted on Facebook. This individual sent the picture to Officer Mode (another deputized federal officer involved) to ask for help with the harassment. Rather than help, however, another Sheriff’s deputy pulled this individual over while driving and stated “I just wanted to see if it was you” and ensuring this individual was aware that his altered picture of him shaking Sheriff Francis’ hand was posted in the Sheriff’s Office.

As this individual stated, “I’ve been suicidal for over a year now and not wanting to come home from prison to bury my parents . . . my dad is and always will be my hero and that’s why I let [Murray] push me as far as he did . . . I’d lay my life down for my dad, mom and sisters and wife and kids.” He continued that “I did what I thought would keep me home with them and also keep them safe from prison from fake charges to get to me.” But, “by late in 2018, . . . they [were] after me to secure me being under [Murray’s] thumb until further say so.”

Murray and his team quickly began acting on their threats.

THE NARCOTICS TEAM TARGETS INDIVIDUAL’S FAMILY MEMBERS

In one of many instances in which Murray and the narcotics team attempted to harm this individual’s family to force him into further assisting in their unlawful actions, Murray, in conjunction with Officer Chavez (also a deputized federal agent) began stalking this individual’s sister and wife.

This individual had just moved to a new residence and, within three days (and no pending charges), Murray began surveilling his home. In a warrant Murray later obtained, he indicated that he observed a vehicle in this individual’s driveway that had no license plate (an entirely legal occurrence). Murray did not state that he every observed anyone driving the vehicle, but maintained that his observation of the vehicle justified a prolonged period of surveillance.

When this individual’s sister exited the house and entered the car, Chavez immediately pulled her over.

Chavez provided no basis for the stop and began asking questions about this individual. This individual’s sister refused to answer any of Chavez’s question, after which the entire narcotics team appeared. Because she would not provide any information to Chavez, Murray suddenly pulled out a bag of narcotics from his pocket and said “look what we have here.” This individual’s sister was arrested.

When the sister spoke with her attorney as to what had happened, the attorney indicated that a judge would likely believe Chavez and Murray over here. As a result, his sister plead guilty to possession of methamphetamine that she never possessed.

Within days of this individual’s sister bonding out on the possession charge, Murray and Officer Mode (another narcotics officer that is also a deputized federal agent) surveilled this individual’s home again. On this day, the individual’s wife left the home with her child to take him to school. Officer Chavez pulled them over – again providing no reason for the stop.

Chavez began questioning the woman about this individual and separated her from her child. The wife refused to provide any information and Chavez began demanding that the wife allow the narcotics team entry into the individual’s home – even attempting to convince her to “just open the door handle.” She refused.

Chavez then began threatening the woman’s child that if he did not provide them with information as to any drugs that the individual may have in his possession that he would never play basketball at his school again and would be in serious trouble. The child knew nothing and, to this day, reports fear of the officers involved.

Despite the wife refusing to provide any information or allow the officers entry into the individual’s residence, the officer kept the wife and child detained until Officer Mode, along with Murray, was able to approach the home and kick the door in with no search or arrest warrant.

This individual was sleeping (as the wife had informed them) and the narcotics team raided his bedroom and moved him outside while they searched the residence. It was only after the narcotics team raided the residence that they obtained a search warrant.

The narcotics team did, however, obtain a warrant approximately three (3) hours after the unlawful intrusion and search had concluded.

Despite this individual never having a drug charge of any type, Murray and the narcotics team charged him with a habitual high-level drug charge. Because this case is still pending, however, we will not discuss this situation in more detail at this time.

Additionally, on the day of his arrest, Sheriff Francis was giving a group of 5-year-olds a tour of the jail. When Francis approached the holding area where the individual was being detained, Francis stated to the group of children that “this is what happens when you don’t listen.”

Francis was well aware of what the black team had done to this individual, that they had asked that he beg for his own freedom by giving up his family’s safety, and that the narcotics team planned to extort this individual’s compliance in perpetuity to ensure the alleged racketeering enterprise run by the narcotics team was allowed to flourish.

NARCOTICS TEAM CONTINUES ATTEMPTS TO FORCE COMPLIANCE

Despite the intolerable and harassing behavior or the narcotics team described above, Murray attempted to leverage the unlawful drug charge above to force this individual to assist the narcotics team once again. Murray assured the individual that he would ensure his charges would be dismissed.

Given that Murray had promised to ensure this individual spent no less than ten (10) years in prison and realizing he had no one that could help him, this individual agreed.

In this instance, however, Murray and several other officers from the narcotics team placed the individual in a situation where his family would have been directly targeted if he cooperated. This time, the individual refused.

In response, Murray promised that he would fabricate additional charges to ensure the individual received multiple other ten (10) year sentences.

The individual responded “you can’t do that. That’s not right.” Murray then bragged “I can do whatever I want, remember – I’m a fed.”

At this point, this individual reached out to RC Catalyst to tell his story. However, this individual’s story took one more perverse twist before the article was ready for publication.

MURRAY, THE NARCOTICS TEAM, AND FRANCIS NEARLY FACILITATE THE DEATH OF THIS INDIVIDUAL’S DAUGHTER

Throughout the entire period that the black team was forcing this individual to assist them in order to save his family, this individual provided information on a number of high-volume drug traffickers. Murray consistently refused to arrest those individuals. Rather, he repeatedly seized their drug proceeds and forced them to continue ensuring narcotics flooded Rutherford County.

Although one specific drug trafficker will be discussed more fully in a subsequent article, Murray’s protection and exploitation of that individual nearly killed this individual’s daughter two nights ago.

The trafficker at issue is the largest source of Fentanyl in this judicial district and has been well-known to the narcotics team for 1-2 years with countless opportunities to arrest him. This trafficker and one of his local distributors have begun using pill pressing machines to sell Fentanyl by claiming it is actually another type of narcotic. In this instance, the trafficker created pills that he claimed were oxycontin.

The trafficker’s distributor sold one such pill to the individual above’s daughter two nights ago. Because of the inconsistency in purity of what this trafficker brings into the county, there have been countless overdoses in the past six (6) months. The individual above’s daughter became one of the most recent victim to the narcotics distribution facilitated by the narcotics team.

As his daughter laid in the hospital unresponsive, the narcotics team refused to take any actions to arrest the individual that had sold the pill to his daughter. This individual had repeatedly provided specific information that should have ended the influx of fentanyl into this community (as had other individuals that RC Catalyst will discuss in the forthcoming article). Yet, despite his own daughter grasping to her life, the narcotics team again refuse to end the influx of fentanyl in this county by charging the individual responsible.

As it turns out, one of the primary suspected reasons the distributor that sold this individual’s daughter the fake oxycontin pill is being protected is his relationship to one of the officers in the Sheriff’s Office.

That decision has now left the individual above in a hopeless situation in which his daughter’s life hangs in the balance while he has no remedy against the injustices inflicted upon the community Sheriff Francis, Ted Bell, Chadd Murray, and the narcotics team.