Due to a tremendous amount of erroneus information on the valuation, tax, credit and appeals processes presented on social media and to honor their commitment to serve the people of Rutherford County, the commissioners had called a special meeting with appropriate experts to answer citizens’ concerns over their new property revaluations. Over 1000 property owners have already filed appeals to the assessments citing improbable increases as much as 100%.
At last Thursday’s special called Rutherford County Commissioners’ meeting, the commissioners opened the meeting with a list of emailed, texted and personally received questions and had the appropriate personnel respond.
Then Chairman Bryan King opened the floor to individual’s questions that had yet to be answered. He dispensed with the usual formality of a sign-up sheet to remove a perceived barrier to speaking up. Many of the presenters spoke of their objection in a manner of a personal appeal. The tax assesser responded by asking them to come talk with him about their individual situations. They also had the option to file an appeal.
The Commissioners, along with the Rutherford County Attorney Richard Williams, explained that Rutherford County is mandated by law as to how it conducts property revaluations, the creates a budget, sets the tax rate, and collects taxes.
Per statute, the county is required to conduct a property revaluation at least every eight years. Due to rapidly esculating property valuations in the second home market in the real estate bubble in the 2005-2008 period, the County opted to conduct revaluations on a four-year cycle to head off drastic valuation changes.
However, this year’s property revaluation shocked many property owners. The pandemic and its effect on the real estate market is felt throughout many counties across North Carolina who have also conducted revaluations this year.
No new tax rate has been set as the requred “revenue neutral” is dependent on the annual county budget.
“We have to operate within the law,” Commission Chairman Bryan King said. “For us to suspend this new valuation, we must have permission from the state legislature.”
The Commissioners resolved to request that our elected legislators pass a bill allowing the County the power to use the existing property valuation of 2019 instead of the 2023-2024 fiscal year revaluation numbers.
The commissioners voted unanimously in favor of the resolution. Should the legislature approve the delegation of power to the counties, other NC counties may also take advantage of the revaluation set aside.
King said state officials have indicated they will move quickly on the legislative request.
Commissioners also noted the rogue GOP members’ orchestrated movement to spread disinformation regarding the property valuation and county tax rate. (See related article.)
“I have seen too much disinformation, and lies,” said Commissioner Alan Toney. “We don’t need this to be happening. We need to be working together. I don’t want my taxes to increase either, but we need your support, not more division.”
The meeting attendees seemed reassured by the factual information presented.
Officials hope to hear back from the state on this new valuation set aside within a few weeks.
CBC Editorial: Monday, Nov. 28, 2022; editorial #8807 The following is the opinion of Capitol Broadcasting Company
Once again an arbitrary and unchecked edict invoked by the North Carolina General Assembly’s leadership is about to make a legal matter they’re already embroiled in even more entangled.
It may end up being a mess that even a state Supreme Court with a newly elected Republican majority won’t be able to unravel. It will result in needless courtroom wrangling at taxpayer expense.
It seems about 18 months ago there was a new policy adopted that emails sent to and from members of the state legislature and the staff can be destroyed after three years. No one apparently has been willing to say under what authority this policy was set or what the specifics of it are. A part of the unspecified policy allows legislators, of their own choosing, to select some email that might be retained for up to 10 years.
These emails don’t belong to Senate leader Phil Berger, House Speaker Tim Moore or Legislative Services Director Paul Coble. The fact that many legislative emails (unlike emails to and from most other state agencies) are by law hidden from disclosure, still they are very much PUBLIC records. They are the property of the people, so says state law: “The public records and public information compiled by the agencies of North Carolina government or its subdivisions are the property of the people”.
The state, by law and by policies that have been set out in executive orders of the governor, the Archives Division and other agencies make record retention generally for at least 10 years.
No one should accept spurious excuses, such as those espoused by Coble that it was about limited storage capacity or cost. A policy guide on public record retention, produced by the state’s Division of Archives, even addressed the cost issue.
“Electronic mail is as much a record as any paper record and must be treated in the same manner,” the guide states. “It is inappropriate to destroy e-mail simply because storage limits have been reached.” The reality is that electronic record storage costs are minimal.The legislature should be preserving, and when necessary producing, the public records necessary to conduct government business and the administration of justice. Again, these records don’t belong to Phil Berger or any other individual. They belong to the people. Legislators and other public officials are merely custodians. The legislature’s policies should be no different than those that cover the governor and other Executive Branch agencies and departments.
Among the many questions that need to be answered by the legislature’s leaders are:
What specifically – and where is it set down in writing – is the policy on retention of email public records sent to and from the members of the General Assembly and its staff?
What was the process for adoption of this policy? Was it adopted by the Legislative Services Commission? If so, when did it meet? What record is there of the action taken?
Or, did it just spring forth from Berger and/or Moore?
No one should be fooled by any of this. This is a brazen effort to hide and destroy public information and records – that quite possibly hides motives and liability.
North Carolinians deserve responsible and accountable leadership from their elected representatives. This is another example of how they aren’t getting it.
To conclude its ARPA reporting project, CPP looks into how other ARPA funds, the $5.4 billion distributed directly to the state, is being spent.
by Shelby Harris November 23, 2022
Carolina Public Press
The Lake Lure dam on March 24. Lake Lure received $200,000 in American Rescue Plan Act funding from the state to conduct an assessment of their sewer system, located beneath the Western North Carolina lake. Photo: Colby Rabon / Carolina Public Press
The federal government distributed North Carolina’s American Rescue Plan Act funds in two ways — $3.2 billion to county and city governments, and $5.4 billion to the state government.
Carolina Public Press spent the past year looking into how ARPA funds are being used by Western North Carolina’s local governments.
To conclude the project, CPP looked into how the other funds, the $5.4 billion distributed directly to the state, is being spent.
The governor’s plan
ARPA, a multitrillion-dollar piece of federal legislation signed into law in March 2021, provides relief funds to state, local and tribal governments that have been negatively impacted by the coronavirus pandemic, “delivering immediate and direct relief to families and workers impacted by the COVID-19 crisis,” according to the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
Governments can use ARPA funds for specific purposes, including addressing public health concerns, replacing lost revenue, expanding broadband and providing premium pay.
County commissioners and city council members throughout the state made spending decisions for the $3.2 million in ARPA funding distributed to local governments. Those decisions varied from fixing sewer systems to bolstering local farmers markets.
For the state’s $5.4 billion ARPA allotment, the N.C. General Assembly made the spending decision, including Gov. Roy Cooper’s ARPA recommendation in the state’s fiscal budget approved in November 2021.
In the recommendation, Cooper wrote that the state’s ARPA allocation should be used for “assisting those families most impacted by the pandemic, upgrading our infrastructure, preparing our workforce, promoting business development and innovation and positioning government to best serve our people.”
Investing in infrastructure
More than half of North Carolina’s ARPA funds have been earmarked to improve the state’s infrastructure, or systems and facilities that maintain the community and economy.
To date, the state has allocated about $2.9 billion (of the $5.4 billion) in ARPA funds toward addressing infrastructure deficits, according to the N.C. Pandemic Recovery Office. Of that amount, about $1.8 billion is reserved for water system improvements, such as repairs to wastewater treatment facilities.
“It’s the category of spending that will probably have the longest sale,” said Lee Lilley, director of the pandemic recovery at the Office of Governor Roy Cooper.
“Built infrastructure takes a little while to do, but it’s really transformative for a lot of places,” Lilley said.
The state is using ARPA to fund N.C. Department of Environmental Quality grants that local governments and nonprofit organizations can apply to get funding for public water system projects.
The projects, many of which will take place on the coast, will update aging infrastructure to ensure clean drinking water for nearby residents.
“Spending money on water and sewer, I mean, that’s foundational for businesses to be able to make investments and to be able to grow. It’s foundational for communities to be able to increase their housing stock,” said Scott Mooneyham from the N.C. League of Municipalities, which advised local governments through ARPA allocations.
Other state ARPA-funded programs include the $48 million Rural Transformation Grant, which provided rural communities funding to enhance communities, revitalize downtowns and strengthen neighborhoods.
ARPA Funding
Broadband in “every corner of the state”
In addition to water system improvements, the state’s other large investment into infrastructure is through its broadband expansion initiative, to which the N.C. General Assembly allocated $660 million in ARPA funding.
Expanding internet access in North Carolina rose in importance during the COVID-19 pandemic, NCDIT Secretary for Broadband and Digital Equity Nate Denny said.
“The pandemic drove home how urgent access to a high-speed internet connection is to every part of modern life: the ability to work from home, learn from home, complete homework, access telemedicine services, apply for jobs or access government services,” Denny said.
Most of North Carolina’s ARPA money for broadband expansion has been used to bolster N.C. Department of Information Technology grants, specifically the Growing Rural Economies with Access to Technology grant and the Completing Access to Broadband program.
Through these programs, the state uses its ARPA money to match funds that local governments or internet providers pledge to broadband infrastructure projects.
In total, $750 million of the state’s ARPA funds will go toward the GREAT grant and CAB program, according to the state budget.
“Our goal here is to ultimately connect every corner of the state to high speed internet,” Lilley said.
According to the governor’s office, broadband infrastructure projects funded through the GREAT grant will provide high-speed internet access to 487,000 households and businesses in North Carolina.
Helping small business
The second-largest portion of North Carolina’s ARPA funds — $666 million — has been disbursed to businesses and organizations, spanning from public libraries to museums.
Get more of our statewide news with impact.
Sign up to receive our free weekday news bulletin and for in-depth, investigative news content about public interest issues in North Carolina.
Within this spending category, more than $500 million in ARPA funding has been earmarked for the Business Recovery Grant, for which small businesses that suffered an economic loss of at least 20% can apply.
More than 7,000 businesses have received funding through the program, according to the governor.
The state’s remaining $1.9 billion is appropriated toward COVID-19 research, premium pay for public school teachers, housing assistance and more.
Challenges with ARPA
Despite billions of ARPA dollars allocated to address the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, many of the issues persist.
An estimated 4 million North Carolina residents lack reliable internet access, and $16.72 billion worth of water infrastructure projects is needed statewide over the next 20 years, according to the U.S. Department of Environment Protection Agency.
“Even with the significant funding we received through ARPA and other funding sources through the pandemic, is it able to solve all the challenges local governments and communities have? Absolutely not. The scale of those challenges are far greater than the funding available,” said Nathan Ramsey from Land of Sky Regional Council, which assisted Western North Carolina’s local governments in ARPA allocation.
All ARPA funds must be allocated by 2024, a deadline the state made with ARPA’s inclusion in the state budget. Any business or organization receiving the funding must spend it by December 2026.
Key milestones for the American Rescue Plan Act from 2021 to 2026. Credit: North Carolina Association of County Commissioners
I was looking a copy of our ballot today and it just made me sad. Where is everyone? Where are the Democrat candidates? Where are the Independent/Unaffiliated candidates? Why are there so many uncontested races in our county?
I know the demographics have shown that we are a Republican leaning county and have been for many years but does that equal to no one having a choice in the general elections?
Elections are supposed to be all about choice. All of our offices except the Sheriff and one school board member have been decided on by the Republican Party. Technically they were all voted in back in May of this past year.
That being said, why does it matter what party anyone represents in a local election? No duties of ANY local elected official have anything to do with making that type of policy. Why does it matter if they have a letter by their name on the ballot?
The judges used to be listed on the ballot without party by their name, as should be because are they not supposed to be an impartial groups of people who just look at the law in relation to court cases? Mike Hager in his short but memorable term in the Legislature pushed through to have the party recognized on the ballot. WHY????
All this does is cause discord among the voters. The party can support whom they will financially but saying that “your candidate” reflects only your values when he/she is running for a job to represent everyone’s values seems unnecessarily divisive. Again, NONE of these people make policy!
There will have to be a legislative act to take off the party affliction of local candidates for elected office but it should be. We as a nation, a state, and a county are dealing with so much division that having this, as an added way to divide is ridiculous.
We have two unaffiliated candidates running, Tony Roberson for Sheriff and Parker Tate for School Board District 2. As an Unaffiliated voter myself (got tired of the “my way or the highway” attitude of both parties years ago) I commend them. They decided to run for office without the support of a political party. This means they had to get signatures to even get on the ballot and figure out financing by themselves. This is no small feat folks especially going against the very powerful and well-funded Republican Party here.
I am not endorsing either candidate but I am saying they cared enough to put in the sweat equity to run for office. What has happened to everyone else in this county? Do they just not care enough to try to make a difference?
There should never be an uncontested office on a ballot in this county. It doesn’t matter if you think the current people in office are doing a good enough job. There still should be a choice for the voters. Sometimes it is not about winning but showing that you care enough to try.
Honestly I think the Democrats of this county should be ashamed that they found no one to run for office except Jason Wease and he actually is answering to a higher calling than them. People need to wake up and get involved in local government. These people directly affect your daily lives and decide how your tax dollars are garnered and spent.
Times are going to get rough. A recession is coming soon and we will have people suffering mightily. Our people, our neighbors, our families will need everything we can dig up to help them. Get involved in how this need will be met. I would say be on a committee but those are hand picked here also. Go to meetings, and sign up to speak. Stand up, speak out, and be heard!
There is nothing we can do about this election now but think about the future. At least give the people a choice!
Early voting starts October 20th. We have multiple uncontested candidates on the ballot but the Sheriff’s race is not one of those. There are three candidates running for this office. Aaron Ellenburg (R), Jason Weast (D), and Tony Roberson (U).
This has been a contentious race and doesn’t look to get any kinder in the next few weeks before the election. Many things have been said or implied about the candidates on social media. If you have any question ask the candidates directly. They will answer you. Your vote is yours to do with as you wish.
One concern that has been brought up in the past and is a concern now is the politicization of the Sheriff’s Office. Being a law enforcement officer is a very difficult and demanding profession and having to deal with the possibility of losing your job over your political leanings every four years is an unnecessary added stress to these trained officers.
Not to even mention how much we require our Sheriff to try to manage and handle. Our jail has been understaffed and incorrectly managed for years now. It has failed multiple inspections and many injuries, incidents, and even deaths have occurred there. It needs full time attention and an involved Sheriff in its operation. Just throwing more money at it will not solve the problems there. Being heavily involved in the safety of the courthouse is also demanding.
In years past we have seen the animal shelter and the 911 center moved from under the Sheriff’s umbrella. Would it be too far fetched to think that having a county police force would be more beneficial to the people of this county? No politics, no jail administration, no courthouse duties.
Other counties in the state have done this with very good results. It takes the politics out of policing and holds officers and staff accountable to county management. Officers will also have clear-cut direct representation and recourse with personnel issues. This would help assure the public that officers and administration would be held accountable for their actions and that the officers themselves would have proper steps to accomplish their training standards.
Doing this would allow the new Sheriff, whomever he is, to concentrate on the jail and the courthouse. The problems of the jail are more than enough for one man and his staff to get straightened out.
This would be an initial expensive outlay for the county but would pay for itself in time. The counties that have done this have been very happy with the results. It gives the Sheriff time to concentrate on the jail and courthouse, which are two very important things that desperately need his full attention.
It takes a legislative act to proceed with such an action but Rutherford County was grated that several years ago. All the commissioners really have to do is vote for it. It would not be an easy transition but one that would ultimately benefit not only the officers but the county as well. Guaranteeing to keep highly trained officers in their jobs with no fear of being removed every four years due to the political climate.
It is a way to build back trust in our community policing. The majority of these officers work very hard and deserve to be appreciated by the people they serve. They are here to protect and serve.
The time to act on this is now for the commissioners. With a new Sheriff coming in after twelve years if they are planning to transition now is the time to do it. If you feel that this is needed in this county please contact your commissioners and let them know. Call 828-287-6060 or email hazel.haynes@rutherfordcountync.gov with your concerns and she will get your message to them.
Let’s bring back “We the people” to our communities.
Back in 2020 I wrote about the reasons why Rutherford County should start their own police force.
It would take the responsibility off of the Sheriff and let him concentrate on the jail and courthouse. (The 911 Communications Center has already been moved from his office.)
It would take political affiliations out of the equation so that officers would not be afraid for their jobs every four years.
The officers and administrators would be accountable to the county but also would have the job protection of the county policies and procedures standing behind them.
It would place officer/administrative accountability in the County’s hands.
It would help to restore the public’s faith in our officers and their behavior.
Accountability has long been an issue with the Sheriff’s Office. There seem to have been way too many people acting on their own without adequate supervision and oversight.
District Attorney Ted Bell has seemingly turned a blind eye to officer incidents and never has an SBI report been revealed to the public concerning these incidents. Even if charges were warranted, D.A. Bell is the person who decides to charge the officer involved or not. During Bell’s tenure a charge was only made once when the assault of a deputy on a handcuffed inmate was captured on video. That conviction is being appealed this month.
In those law enforcement cases there has been no one that the public could turn to for answers. Cloak and dagger seem to be the operating procedure as far as the general public was concerned.
Recently we have seen more information coming out of the Sheriff’s Office and they have installed a body scanner at the jail, but really, is this too little, too late?
Sheriff Francis is leaving office this year. He is not running for sheriff again. We will have a new sheriff after the November election. There are three good men running for this office but as I have said before, are we not asking too much of one man?
The jail is absolutely out of control. It is going to take a full time commitment to try to fix it. That is hard to do if you are also trying to supervise and coordinate the officers of the Sheriff’s Department whose responsibilities cover Rutherford County. Gaston and Mecklenburg Counties started their own county police departments and left the Sheriff to run the jail and courthouse.
In 2020 I stated that it would take Legislative action to make that even a possibility. I have been researching lately and came across a Senate Bill from 1983 that specifically addresses this issue for Rutherford County.
It was a time when the Commissioners had to face the possibility that their Sheriff might be in some legal difficulty and they would need something in place in the event that he could not perform his duties. The Sheriff (at that time) got it worked out so the County did not pursue it but the Legislation still stands. It reads as follows:
Section 1. The Rutherford County Board of Commissioners is authorized to establish a county police force, to appoint a police chief, to employ other police officers, and to establish the jurisdiction of the county police force within Rutherford County, effective on or after the first Monday in December of 1986.
Sec. 2. Pursuant to this act and other provisions of law, the Rutherford County Board of Commissioners shall adopt and promulgate rules governing the establishment and operation of the Rutherford County police force. Such rules shall be filed with the clerk to the Board of County Commissioners and shall be made available for public inspection at reasonable times.
Sec. 3. (a) The Rutherford County Board of Commissioners MAY put the question of establishing a county police force to a referendum of the qualified voters of Rutherford County. The referendum shall be conducted by the Rutherford County Board of Elections under the provisions of Chapter 163 of the General Statutes.
(b) The questions on the ballot shall be:
“@ FOR establishment of a county police force. @ AGAINST establishment of a county police force.”
(c) If the Rutherford County Board of Commissioners CHOOSES to hold a referendum under this section and a majority of the voters vote “FOR establishment of a county police force”, then the Rutherford County Board of Commissioners shall appoint a county police force under Sections 1 and 2 of this act.
Sec. 4. This act is effective upon ratification.
In the General Assembly read three times and ratified, this the 6th day of May, 1983.
Two very important words here, “MAY” and “CHOOSES”, mean that the Commissioners can decide on their own to implement this policy without a vote if they so choose.
The reason that this is so very important at this time is if the County is going to do this they need to decide before the November election. It would be much easier to implement this change before a new administration takes over. Not impossible mind you but easier on everybody concerned.
With all the issues that we currently have with the jail, possible corruption, excessive violence complaints, and outright negligence it is time for the county to step up and do something for the citizens of this county. There is little to no confidence of our current Sheriff’s Office by the general public. It is time to change that.
It is time to let the good officers shine and given them all some protection from political repercussions of their own beliefs. It is time for accountability. It is time for action.
If this is something you feel it is time for, contact your County Commissioners. You can contact any of them not just your district representative and let them know. You can leave them a message at 828-287-6060 or you can email them at the following addresses:
The next County Commissioner meeting is Tuesday September 6th at 6 p.m. in the County Annex Building on 289 N.Main Street in Rutherfordton. Anyone can sign up before the meeting to speak for two (2) minutes and let them know how you feel about this.
Stand up and speak out. This is your community and your tax dollars. Let’s bring transparency, trust and accountability back to the police in our county.
RALEIGH – Governor Cooper has signed a bill that allows notaries to use internet technologies to identify people and notarize their signatures remotely. This significant legislation means homebuyers will soon be able to close loans and buy houses from the comfort of their couch, marking a major advance in Secretary of State Elaine F. Marshall’s twenty-five year effort to lead the digital transformation of North Carolina’s business environment.
Because of the extensive work required to implement permanent Remote Online Notarization (RON), the portion of House Bill 776 addressing RON becomes effective July 1, 2023. Emergency video notarizations will resume, effective immediately, as a stop-gap measure to allow video notarizations while permanent RON procedures are being put in place.
“Everyone in North Carolina needs to be able to sign contracts safely and conveniently, without sacrificing the certainty of knowing that people signing important documents like wills and loans are exactly who they say they are. Emergency Video Notarizations were crucial tools during the height of the COVID pandemic. The next step, establishing a permanent RON solution that matches intuitive technology with transactional security, is central to maintaining a vibrant and sustainable e-commerce culture across the state that’s accessible for everyone,” said Secretary Marshall.
The new Remote Online Notary fee will be $25 per principal signature when RON becomes effective in July of 2023. The new law also immediately updates other fees that notaries public across the state can charge. The maximum fee that can be charged per principal signature has increased from $5 to $10 for acknowledgments, jurats, and verifications or proofs. For oaths or affirmations without a signature, the
maximum fee has increased from $5 to $10 per person, except for the identity of a principal or subscribing witness. The fee for electronic notarizations under G.S. 10B-188 will be $15.
For any notarial act performed under the State Notary Public Act, actual mileage at the federal mileage rate (62.5 cents per mile) can be charged if the travel reimbursement is agreed to by the principal in writing prior to travel.
The Secretary of State’s Office will next begin the administrative rulemaking process to create the requirements and procedures needed to implement the permanent RON law.
Cindy Cross was diagnosed with breast cancer about 15 years ago and found compassionate medical care when she first visited Michelle Taylor Skipper’s office in Laurinburg.
Cross has been a patient of Skipper’s ever since, and her two adult daughters see her, too. In Skipper, Cross has found a trusted medical provider who goes out of her way to answer questions during unhurried appointments.“She’s a phenomenal doctor,” Cross said. “I would rather go to her than anyone.”
Skipper has a doctorate degree in nursing practice. An advanced practice registered nurse, she diagnoses and treats patients in Laurinburg one day a week. She also directs the Doctor of Nursing Practice program at East Carolina University in Greenville.
But there are limits to what Skipper can do.
She was frustrated, for instance, by what she viewed as regulatory bureaucracy when she wanted to see patients at a mobile medical center that rolled into her town of St. Pauls in Robeson County. She couldn’t treat the patients because the doctor in charge at the mobile center was not listed as her supervisor on the documentation nurse practitioners must maintain.
“I was never able to care for my own community as a nurse practitioner because of those barriers,” she said during an interview at the church in St. Pauls that her late husband led. “Super frustrating.”
When Kohn retires, Skipper said, she will have to retire too, or find another doctor to supervise her and agree to monthly quality improvement meetings.
“When he retires and I change supervising docs, I have to start a relationship with that physician like I was a brand new graduate.”
A debate over state law
State law requires advanced practice registered nurses like Skipper to have a medical doctor as a supervisor. “Advanced practice registered nurses” is an umbrella term covering four nursing specialists who hold advanced degrees: nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives, clinical nurse specialists, and certified registered nurse anesthetists. Together and separately, these groups of nurses have tried for years to convince the legislature to allow them to practice independent of doctors’ supervision.
Many nurses, including Skipper, want autonomy for advanced practice registered nurses written into law via legislation, and most legislators back it.
Nurse practitioners and the doctors who supervise them don’t have to collaborate on the treatment of each patient. Skipper describes her professional relationship with her supervisor, OB/GYN Dr. Harvey Kohn, as more like a partnership. Skipper has her own patients. Kohn sometimes checks her patient charts, when she isn’t there to review lab results, for example. But he’s not double-checking her work, she said.It’s not uncommon for advanced practice nurses to open their own medical practices. Their supervising doctors must be available for consultation but don’t have to work on site. In some cases, doctors work for the practices under contract. Doctors do not have to routinely review patient charts.
The nurses maintain that cutting this thin thread of supervision will attract more advanced practice nurses to rural areas with doctor shortages. Doctors, however, want to maintain their role as supervisors, and dispute the claim that advanced practice nurses will help relieve shortages of health care providers in rural areas. Opposition from doctors’ groups has helped stonewall efforts to provide more leeway for advanced practice registered nurses.
Twenty-four states and Washington, D.C., allow nurse practitioners to diagnose and treat patients without doctors’ supervision. Supporters see a new opportunity that could win advanced practice nurses autonomy in North Carolina. A legislative committee on Medicaid expansion and health care access is digging into questions of current and anticipated shortages of medical workers.
Doctors are concentrated in urban counties. In 68 of the state’s 100 counties the number of primary care doctors per 10,000 residents fell below the overall state rate of 7.06, according to 2019 data from the Sheps Center for Health Services Research at UNC. Two small counties had no primary care doctors. Nurse practitioners are more widely distributed, although they are also easier to find in urban counties and those with major hospitals. One county in the state’s northeast corner, Camden, had no nurse practitioner in 2020, according to Sheps Center data.
The state is adding nurse practitioners more quickly than it is primary care doctors, according to the Sheps data.
Dr. Karen Smith, a family doctor with her own practice in Hoke County, said it’s important to continue to require collaborative agreements between doctors and nurse practitioners.
Although a federal study using information from 2010 found that nurse practitioners were more likely than primary care physicians to practice in rural areas, Smith cited information from the American Medical Association from three states that showed allowing nurses to practice independently doesn’t increase the likelihood they’ll work in rural areas.
“It has been a difficult struggle to encourage nurse practitioners and physician assistants to serve in our rural areas,” she said.
Smith is medical director for the Hoke County health department and supervises the nurse practitioner and physician assistant who work there. The mix of experience and education on the team are important to patient treatment, she said.
It’s important as the supervisor for her to know what advanced practice providers are comfortable doing, she said. For example, she said, the advanced practice providers she supervises are not comfortable prescribing opiates. And understanding how those providers work informs Smith about often they need to meet to review patient charts.
“If the experience, education, skills and comfort level mean we are going to review charts every week, we’ll review charts every week,” she said.
Different approaches in different communities
Certified registered nurse anesthetists, or CRNAs, must work under a doctor’s supervision, but what that looks like depends on the hospital. Eleven hospitals in the state have only CRNAs who do the work of anesthetizing patients, monitoring them in the operating room, and waking them up, said Stacy Yancey, president of the NC Association of Nurse Anesthetists. Some hospitals in the eastern part of the state have anesthesiologists, medical doctors, who work during the day, with CRNAs on duty nights and weekends, she said, and a majority of plastic surgery practices and endoscopy centers hire only CRNAs.
Yancey works for a staffing agency, and has experience working in a variety of settings. In a rural hospital, she’s responsible for assessing patients before surgeries, administering anesthesia, and waking them up.
When she works in a hospital with an anesthesiologist, that doctor does the preoperative assessments and fills out all the forms.
Again, depending on the hospital, the anesthesiologist may not enter the operating room. At some hospitals the anesthesiologists come into the operating room shortly before or while Yancey is administering general anesthesia; those doctors leave when the patient is stable, and Yancey stays there.
“Sometimes they will come and check on me during long cases to see if I need anything,” Yancey said.
“The standard of care in the O.R. is the same no matter who is providing the anesthesia,” she said, and a law allowing CRNAs to work without supervising doctors would clear up gray areas.
Skipper, the nurse practitioner from St. Pauls, is convinced that advanced practice nurses from rural areas will want to stay there, as she has.Independence for advanced practice nurses will also advance entrepreneurship, she said.
Schquthia Peacock, a nurse practitioner in Cary, has co-owned her practice with a doctor for 22 years.“I have had my own panel of patients – patients who call me their primary healthcare provider,” she said.
The decision to become a practice owner was sudden and came shortly after the medical practice where she had taken a job went bankrupt.
“We didn’t want to lose the practice and the patients,” she said. “We felt it would be best to continue the practice as it was.”
The office is arranged so Peacock, her physician partner and the nurse practitioners the practice employs can meet during the work day to discuss patient care. “We call it a collaboration,” she said. “We consider ourselves a team working toward patient care.”
Jennie Mayo, a patient of Skipper’s in Laurinburg, chooses care from nurse practitioners. “They listen to me,” she said. “Doctors sometimes dismiss you.”
Mayo first saw Skipper in 1992. Mayo left the state in 2010 but sought out Skipper again upon returning to Laurinburg in 2017.
“We just hit it off,” Mayo said. “She’s funny. She remembers you.”
“I was lucky enough that she took me back,” Mayo said. “In a small town, it’s often hard to find a family doctor, an OB/GYN – it’s hard to find medical care.”
Mayo knows that advanced practice nurses are pushing to be able to practice independent of doctors’ supervision. She thinks they should have that autonomy.
“They’re educated adults and perfectly capable of making informed medical decisions,” she said.
On her morning commute to work, Dr. Laura Ucik, a rural family physician in the northern Piedmont of North Carolina, thinks about the patients who could have avoided serious illness and injury had they qualified for Medicaid years ago.
One such patient with severe stomach pain couldn’t afford an ultrasound to identify whether or not they had gallstones.
Another arrived with a swollen leg, a common but urgent symptom of a blood clot. Unable to pay for imaging and blood thinning medication, they left without a diagnosis.
“I have a patient who had rectal bleeding for over a year, and they were eventually diagnosed with rectal cancer,” Ucik said. “Recently, they found out the cancer had begun to metastasize to other parts of the body. It all could have been avoided if they had had insurance to cover a colonoscopy.”
While thousands of North Carolinians struggle to keep their health in check, healthcare providers across the state are being pushed to their limits as people with no coverage flood their offices.
North Carolina is one of only 12 states that still hasn’t expanded its Medicaid coverage. With almost 2.7 million North Carolina residents already enrolled in Medicaid, up to 626,000 are now in what is called the Medicaid coverage gap.
The gap refers to people whose income is too high to qualify for Medicaid, but not enough to afford other insurance. In addition, all childless non-disabled adults are ineligible regardless of how low their income is.
Medicaid was created to provide health insurance to low-income families and individuals in 1965. However, 12.9% of North Carolina’s population remained uninsured in 2018.
For healthcare providers, the gap has meant struggles to provide care for patients who wait too long or don’t have the ability to afford testing and treatment. It means long hours trying to find care.
Dr. Joel L. Gallagher is an allergist-immunologist with offices in Reidsville and Greensboro, North Carolina. About two-thirds of his patients are either uninsured or covered by federally funded insurance like Medicaid or Medicare.
“Scrambling to find the cheapest option adds a lot more time to providing healthcare, which isn’t ideal when you’re treating asthma,” Gallagher said. “Many of my patients need medication everyday just to breathe.”
When Gallagher’s office can’t find an affordable solution, they often send patients home with drug samples. For some, these samples are the only way to get medication because they can’t afford a prescription. However, these samples only last a few weeks.
As a result, some patients ration their medications at home. When an asthmatic isn’t properly dosed for their condition, they can have asthma attacks, which are more serious and can be traumatizing to patients.
Although Gallagher can occasionally waive the charges for a breathing test or other procedure, he has to be careful that his office isn’t writing off too much. “We still have to worry about paying our staff’s salaries at the end of the day,” he said.
Still others have taken up a personal campaign to persuade North Carolina politicians to approve expansion. The political atmosphere has held talk of expanding for years, but so far, the majority of legislators in the state remain in opposition. However, support for expansion is shifting, and although the change is slow, more representatives are beginning to show their support.
At the forefront of this movement in North Carolina is Casey Cooper, the CEO of the Cherokee Indian Hospital. There, Cooper and his staff serve all members of the tribe, as well as select other groups, including spouses of a tribe member and all children under the age of 19.
Casey Cooper, CEO of the Cherokee Indian Hospital, speaking to the Macon County Board of Commissioners. Photo by Brittney Lofthouse, the Western Region Educational Coordinator at Care 4 Carolina.
Although activism isn’t in his job description, Cooper recounts a personal story about how the lack of health insurance impacted a childhood friend.
Cooper and Albert Hartline went to high school together in Jackson County. Hartline suffered from depression and substance use disorders, the combination of which eventually led to his unemployment and lack of health insurance.
Several years later, Hartline was diagnosed with cancer. He knew he didn’t have the resources to pay for his treatment, and his mental health and addiction spiraled out of control. According to Cooper, life became unbearable for Hartline because he knew he couldn’t afford treatment for his potentially terminal illness.
In December 2020, Hartline died by suicide shortly after killing his neighbor. Hartline got caught in a situation that could have been avoided had he been able to get insurance, said Cooper. In his office at the hospital, a plaque memorializing Hartline sits on the windowsill.
In the following years, Cooper set up meetings to talk with conservative county commissioners across the state about Medicaid expansion. He persuaded Swain, Jackson, Macon, Clay and Graham county commissioners to change their stance on Medicaid coverage, he says. But Cherokee, Transylvania and Haywood county commissioners did not sign a resolution after meeting with him.
“People think that folks without insurance are choosing not to work, which is a horrible misunderstanding,” Cooper said. “The majority of uninsured people are working, and they are working poor.”
In addition to the stereotype that uninsured people are unmotivated to improve their situation, Medicaid expansion carries another generalization regarding what, and who, it was related to in the past.
“For a lot of Republican officials, Medicaid expansion is tied to Obamacare, which they’re against, and maybe that’s that,” said Madeline Guth, a policy analyst in the Kaiser Family Foundation’s Program on Medicaid and the Uninsured. “State politics can vary, but there’s a lot of long-standing opposition in North Carolina.”
Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to make participation in Medicaid expansion optional for states in 2012, the number of people who would qualify has increased. In many of North Carolina’s 78 rural counties, health care clinics and doctor’s offices are few and far between, making it difficult for people to get the care they need before their condition takes a turn for the worst.
As part of its efforts to provide universal care, the Cherokee Indian Hospital administers treatment regardless of the patient’s ability to pay. While this relieves the financial stressor from members of the tribe, the hospital is spending millions of dollars every year that could be used elsewhere.
In some cases, adding a financial burden can mean the difference between someone living and dying because of their condition; a situation Ucik knows all too well.
On a daily basis, she sees upward of 10 patients living with medical issues that could be treated if they had insurance. However, most can’t afford the cost out of pocket and are unable to receive proper treatment day after day.
“It is unbelievable the things we are doing as healthcare workers to try and provide for our patients without the proper resources,” Ucik said. “Every day I am bending over backwards to solve problems that can only be diagnosed and treated with tests, medications and referrals to specialists.”
After another long day of finding temporary solutions to long-term problems, Ucik reflects on how her job would be so much easier if her patients had the ability to get help before their situation turned desperate.
“The money we aren’t spending now when people come in without insurance doesn’t even compare with the money we spend later on once their conditions have worsened,” Ucik said. “This isn’t healthcare; people will continue to suffer until the legislation changes.”
UNC Media Hub reporter Lauren Ketwitz is a senior from Polk County, North Carolina majoring in journalism and minoring in Hispanic studies. Keyshawn Garrett is a rising senior from Enfield, majoring in Journalism and concentrating on graphic design in the UNC Hussman School of Journalism and Media.
Sunshine Week — March 13-19 this year — promotes a dialogue about the importance of open government and freedom of information. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis’ quote “sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants” is the basis for the name Sunshine Laws. These laws for state public record and open meeting laws, as well as the federal Freedom of Information Act, promote transparency in government. Informed citizenry is the best deterrent against government corruption.
Government transparency, a non-partisan principle, transcends who’s in office or which political party is in control. Freedom of information or “sunshine” laws open up government and empower people through information.
We all need accurate information to shape our opinions and best advocate for ourselves.