Former LEO Jamie Dunn Loses Appeal for Assault On A Restrained Prisoner

Rutherford County Courthouse

9-21-22

Rutherfordton- What a day in the courthouse in Rutherfordton!  This almost sounds like the set up for a Lifetime movie.

Jamie Dunn

The Main Players:

Jamie Dunn, a former Sheriff’s deputy who was fired for assaulting a restrained prisoner in the jail, who now is associated with Independent Sheriff candidate Tony Robinson to be his Chief Deputy if elected.

Attorney Greg Newman was representing Jamie Dunn. Mr. Newman has been approved to work in Asheville and Buncombe County as a defense attorney for indigent clients.

Greg Newman

He is the former disgraced district attorney that Superior Court Judge Robert C. Ervin issued his order against on April 27, 2021 permanently removing the top criminal prosecutor for Henderson, Polk and Transylvania counties from his elected office, finding Newman engaged in “willful misconduct in office” and “conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice which brings the office into disrepute,” under N.C. General Statute 7A-66. Only the 3rd removal of a D.A. in NC history.

ADA Lacey Beam

The judge hearing the case was Judge Gould who was asked to hear this case.

The ADA for this trial was Lacey Beam.  She graduated from Charlotte School of Law and this is her first job as an attorney.

Assault victim Christian Eugene Hardin originally said in the first trial that on October 2020 several Sheriff’s deputies responded to a call involving domestic violence at his residence.  From the time the officers arrived until he was placed in the jail, Hardin described two incidents where several deputies allegedly assaulted him.

First, during the arrest, Hardin claimed that several officers pulled him out of the police vehicle due to his behavior and physically assaulted him by, among other things, slamming his head on the ground, and engaging in an altercation that left his ribs broken and wrists in pain.

Second, after being restrained in the jail, Hardin stated, “this rage went through me.  I started cussing at [Dunn], being very disrespectful.”  Although Hardin claimed that he could not remember any specific comments directed toward Dunn, he stated that Dunn suddenly struck him once on the right side of the face. (See video of incident below)

Mr. Hardin now says he has no memory of the event and personally did not want to press charges against Mr. Dunn but since he was in custody when the assault happened Sheriff Chris Francis did it.

SBI Agent Matthew Davis who did not show up to testify at this trial but was instrumental in the first one. During Agent Davis’ testimony in the first trial, he explained that there was considerable delay before the District Attorney requested that the SBI investigate. As a result, Hardin was not interviewed until approximately ten (10) days after the incident.

Once Agent Davis began his investigation, he explained that he reviewed video footage for the entire incident, including what occurred during the arrest and in the jail.  Dunn’s counsel asked whether Agent Davis had uncovered any additional misconduct in reviewing the video footage or otherwise.  Agent Davis responded that he had discovered no additional wrongdoing.  In fact, Agent Davis stated that he had not even interviewed the other officers that allegedly assaulted Hardin and broken his ribs.

When Dunn’s counsel asked why Davis had neither spoken with the other officers that Hardin claims assaulted him or looked at other possible incidents of misconduct, Davis testified that he was to look only at any potential wrongdoing “in the jail” and that he was specifically instructed “not to stray away from that.”

Now that you know the main players and have some background. This is how the trial went. This was a juried trial heard in Superior Court on September 20,2022 in Rutherford County.

It appeared to be a slam-dunk for the state since they had actual video of the incident. Officers stated on the stand that that Dunn had a history of control issues and had been disciplined in the past.  (sticks and stone may break my bones but words will never hurt me….remember that one?)

 

Tony Robertson

Dunn said that he had just suffered the loss of his mother but felt he had to go in that day “for his guys.” He said the victim made multiple remarks towards him and finally got explicit about his daughter. He then said he snapped and hit him. Mr. Dunn talked about his service and that he was a good officer. He implied that there might have been other reasons that he was fired because of this incident as no other officers were charged for the other assaults. (Mr. Dunn was supporting Tony Roberson who at that time was going to be running against Sheriff Chris Francis before he withdrew from the race)

ADA Beam asked one question of Mr. Dunn after his testimony. That question was “Was the defendant restrained when you struck him?” Mr. Dunn answered yes and she said no further questions.

In closing arguments Mr. Newman started instructing the jury on the issue of intent stating that intent meant you had to have ill will with intention to hurt the other person. The judge interrupted him at this point and took him back to chambers as he was totally misrepresenting the law. The judge then returned from chambers and instructed the jury that Mr. Newman was WRONG in his explanation of the law.

ADA Beam said Mr. Dunn was in area he was not supposed to be in and it was his decision to exchange insults, touch him then hit him.

The jury deliberated a very short time and returned with a guilty verdict against Mr. Dunn.

So many questions about this case still are circling around and we may never know the complete truth but you have got to admit, it is quite the story.

Silence Speaks Volumes When It Comes To Politically Endorsing D.A. Ted Bell

 

May 6, 2022

As everyone in District Attorney Ted Bell’s district is aware Mr. Bell recently sent out a district wide political mailer stating that the heads of all law enforcement unanimously endorsed him in the race for the office of D.A. in the upcoming May 17th primary election.

Ted Bell’s Political Mailer

The reason this is so very important at this time is that this primary decides who the next District Attorney will be as there is no Democrat party opponent.  The race is strictly between Mr. Bell and Marion Attorney Krinn Evans.

D.A.Ted Bell with Judge Randy Pool

There have been numerous complaints and concerns about Ted Bell’s performance as the District Attorney for the past seven (7) years of his administration. The most recent being his apparently “protection” of former Judge Randy Pool. So it was surprising to see him claim that the head of every law enforcement agency in his district endorsed his candidacy.

The real surprise being that it is actually against the law to politically endorse a candidate if you or your department receive any federally funded grants or monies. All of these named officials departments receive federal funding in some form.

Mr. Bell knows about the restrictions and penalties of violating the Hatch Act, yet he still went with this advertising campaign putting each official and their department in potential jeopardy. After having it brought to his attention he tried to “walk it back” on Facebook with a post saying that they were “personal” endorsements, not official ones. Hummm….not what the flyer received in the mailbox  (shown above) said.

Mr. Bell has not posted any written endorsements by any of these officials. Each official was contacted multiple times via email and asked specifically if they endorsed Mr. Bell. Now be advised each of these officials work for the taxpayer and are answerable to them. Silence from all but one……..

Marion Police Chief Allan Lawrence did answer the request for comment saying “ The only position that I have taken in this matter has been an indication of personal support for the current District Attorney’s office.” He specifically used the word “office” not “person” or “political”. I have to take a minute and congratulate the people and city of Marion for having a Chief with such integrity to be brave enough to stand up and state publicly exactly what he said.

 

These are the “SILENT”  ones,

Chief Clint Ingle of Rutherfordton Police Department (who it appears recently removed a banner with Ted Bell’s image on it illegally at Ted Bell’s request),

SILENT!

 

Spindale Police Chief Eric Shelton

Chief Eric Shelton of Spindale Police Department,

SILENT!

 

 

Chief Chris LeRoy of Forest City Police Department,

SILENT!

 

 

LLPD Sean Humphries

Chief Sean Humphries of Lake Lure Police Department,

SILENT!

 

 

Old Fort PD Chief Melvin Lyle

Chief Melvin Lytle of Old Fort Police Department,

SILENT!

 

 

Sheriff Chris Francis

Sheriff Chris Francis of Rutherford County, and

SILENT!

 

 

McDowell County Sheriff Ricky Buchanan

Sheriff Ricky Buchanan of McDowell County have all remained suspiciously quiet.

SILENT!

 

 

 

These officials have not replied to multiple emails asking about their professional versus personal endorsements of Ted Bell.   Even after being told that they could be reported for violating the Hatch Act. I do understand that they have in fact been reported for investigation to the U.S. Special Council for violating this law due to the fact that they have remained silent.

A violation of this can result in dismissal and loss of funding for the official/department found in violation. It is a very serious charge with very serious consequences. Mr. Bell has in fact, by doing this, put his entire district in jeopardy.

Their silence on this matter does not release them from this, quite the contrary. It makes them seem guilty. I do feel for them as they are proverbially caught between a rock and a hard place. If they confirm, then they are guilty of breaking the law, if they don’t then they are guilty of confirming that D.A. Ted Bell was lying about their endorsements and since he continues in his position until January it could make making working with him very difficult.

Either way Ted Bell has put them in an untenable position. It is hard to believe that only one of these gentlemen “manned up” and actually answered the question asked. What does that say about the leadership of law enforcement in our communities? Silence in this instance is not golden.

Transparency must be returned to our governing bodies. It starts with you. Vote!

Your vote in tis primary determines who our next District Attorney will be. Vote for honesty and transparency.

Early voting continues until May 14th. Final voting in this primary is May 17th.